UC Hastings College of the Law
Professor of  Law
Professor K. Weisberg
Weisberg - Home
Children & Law
Syllabus
Handouts
Old Exams
Links
Family Law
Syllabus
Handouts
Old Exams
Links
Feminist Legal Theory
Syllabus
Handouts
Old Exams
Links
Wills & Trust
Syllabus
Handouts
Old Exams
Links
Resources
Library
Bio
UC Hastings

 

FEMINIST LEGAL THEORY SEMINAR
Syllabus
PDF Version; WordPerfect Version; MS Word Version
I. Course Description. Feminist legal theory is one of the most important movements in legal scholarship today. Following the birth of the women's movement in the late 1960's and early 1970's, feminist litigators and scholars became interested in the application of legal doctrine to issues affecting women. The field of feminist legal theory was formulated in the early 1980's when feminist law professors broadened the scope of courses that were formerly called "Women and the Law," and "Sex-Based Discrimination."

Feminist legal theory is an analysis and critique of women's position in patriarchal society (i.e., an examination of the nature and extent of women's subordination). Feminist legal theory essentially has two elements. The first is an exploration and critique of theoretical issues about the interaction between law and gender. The second is the application of a feminist perspective to areas of law such as reproduction, battering, pornography, prostitution, rape, employment. The theme of the course is the relationship between law, gender, and equality.

II. Required Texts. Two paperback texts will be required for the seminar. These include: 

D. Kelly Weisberg, ed., Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations (Temple University Press, 1990), and D. Kelly Weisberg, ed., Applications of Feminist Legal Theory to Women's Lives: Sex, Violence, Work, and Reproduction (Temple University Press, 1995). Both texts are collections of essays on feminist legal theory. Readings will be approximately 50-60 pages per week.

The first text explores fundamental theoretical issues of equality, including the meaning of equality, different models of equality, the limitations of equality theory, the implications of woman's self-definition for equality; the contribution of feminist methodology; and the relevance of various theoretical frameworks (liberal feminist, radical feminism, socialist feminist, etc.).

The second volume applies the aforementioned theoretical issues to substantive contexts.

For example, it explores whether specific practices (pornography, prostitution, surrogacy, motherhood) contribute to women's subordination or to women's empowerment; whether taking into account women's biological differences (in the contexts of battering, rape, sexual harassment, reproductive control) contributes to women's equality or inequality; and whether women's barriers in the workplace stem from biological differences or from discrimination.

III. Class Instruction. The seminar will have three components: (1) class discussion of reading assignments; (2) independent research of a topic selected by the student (in consultation with the instructor); and (3) preparation of a paper on the chosen topic (in consultation with the instructor). A precis (or focus statement) of the seminar paper (7 pg, including bibliography) is due in my faculty mailbox on Mon., Sept. 23, 2002 by 4PM. Final papers are due on Mon., Dec. 3, 2002 by 4 PM. Please note that all late papers will be down-graded by one letter grade.
Week #1
Introduction to Feminist Legal Theory Required Reading:

1. Taub & Schneider, Women's Subordination and the Role of Law, pp 9-21 (Foundations, v.1);

2. Wishik, To Question Everything, pp. 22-31 (Foundations, v. 1);

3. Dalton, Where We Stand: Observations on the Situation of Feminist Legal Thought, pp. 32- 39 (Foundations, v. 1);

4. Bender, A Lawyer's Primer on Feminist Theory and Tort, pp. 58-74 (Foundations, v. 1);

5. Robin West, Jurisprudence and Gender, pp. 75-98 (Foundations, v. 1).
Week #2
Equality Theory and Its Limitations Required Reading:

1. Becker, Prince Charming: Abstract Equality, pp. 221-236 (Foundations, v. 1);

2. Cain, Feminism and the Limits of Equality, 237-247 (Foundations, v. 1);

3. MacKinnon, Difference and Dominance: On Sex Discrimination, pp. 276-287 (Foundations, v. 1)

4. MacKinnon, Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: An Agenda for Theory, pp. 437-453 (Foundations, v. 1);

5. Colker, The Anti-Subordination Principle, pp. 288-300 (Foundations, v. 1).
Week #3
Equal Treatment versus Special Treatment Required Reading:

1. Williams, Equality's Riddle, pp. 128-155 (Foundations, v. 1);

2. Krieger & Cooney, pp. 156-179 (Foundations, v. 1);

3. Kay, Equality and Difference, pp. 180-189 (Foundations, v. 1);

4. Finley, Transcending Equality Theory, pp. 190-207 (Foundations, v. 1).
Week #4
Essentialism: Gender and Race Required Reading:

1. Minow, Feminist Reason, pp. 339-347 (Foundations, v. 1);

2. Harris, Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory, pp. 348-358 (Foundations, v. 1);

3. Cain, Feminist Jurisprudence: Grounding the Theories, pp. 359-370 (Foundations, v.1);

4. Kline, Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory, pp. 371-382 (Foundations, v. 1);

5. Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex, pp. 383-395 (Foundations, v.1).
Week 5
Theories of Law Required Reading:

1. Rifkin, Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy, pp. 412-418 (Foundations, v. 1);

2. Polan, Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy, pp. 419-426 (Foundations, v.1);

3. MacKinnon, Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State, pp. 427-436 (Foundations, v.1);

4. Olsen, Statutory Rape: A Feminist Critique of Rights Analysis, pp. 485-495 (v.1);

5. Schneider, The Dialectic of Rights and Politics, pp. 507-526 (Foundations, v. 1).
Week #6
Feminist Legal Methods Required Reading:

1. Mossman, Feminism and Legal Method, pp. 539-549 (Foundations, v.1);

2. Bartlett, Feminist Legal Methods, pp. 550-570 (Foundations, v.1);

3. Finley, Breaking Women's Silence in Law, pp. 571-582 (Foundations, v.1);

4. Ashe, Zig-zag Stitching and the Seamless Web, pp. 582-593 (Foundations, v.1);

5. Williams, On Being the Object of Property, pp. 594-602 (Foundations, v. 1).
Week 7
Pornography Required Reading:

1. MacKinnon, Not a Moral Issue, pp. 37-58 (Applications, v. 2);

2. American Booksellers Ass'n v. Hudnut, pp 104-109 (Applications, v. 2);

3. Butler v. The Queen, pp. 110-117 (Applications, v. 2);

4. Emerson, Pornography and the 1st Amendment: A Reply to Professor MacKinnon, pp. 80-86 (Applications, v. 2);

5. Strossen, A Feminist Critique of "The" Feminist Critique of Pornography, pp. 131-149 (Applications, v. 2);

6. West, The Difference in Women's Hedonic Lives, pp. 162-183 (Applications, v.2).
Week 8
Prostitution Required Reading:

1. Walkowitz, Male Vice and Female Virtue, pp. 199-207 (Applications, v.2);

2. Ericsson, Charges Against Prostitution, pp. 208-216 (Applications, v.2);

3. Pateman, Defending Prostitution: Charges Against Ericsson, pp. 217-221 (Applications, v.2);

4. MacKinnon, Prostitution and Civil Rights, pp. 222-236 (Applications, v.2);

5. Freeman, The Feminist Debate over Prostitution Reform, pp. 237-249 (Applications, v. 2).

6. Baldwin, Split at the Root: Prostitution and Feminist Discourses of Law Reform, pp. 261-271(v. 2).
Week 9
Battered Women Required Reading:

1. Schechter: The Roots of the Battered Women's Movement, pp. 296-305 (Applications, v.2);

2. State v. Wanrow, pp. 306-310 (Applications, v.2);

3. Schneider, Describing and Changing: Women's Self Defense Work, pp. 311-326 (v. 2);

4. Mahoney, Legal Images of Battered Women, pp. 341-362 (Applications, v. 2);

5. Crenshaw, Violence Against Women of Color, pp. 363-377 (Applications, v.2);

6. Robson, Lavender Bruises: Intra-Lesbian Violence, pp. 378-387 (Applications, v. 2)
Week 10
Rape Required Reading:

1. Griffin, Rape: The All-American Crime, pp. 422-430 (Applications, v.2);

2. Estrich, Rape, pp. 431-454 (Applications, v. 2);

3. Michael M. v. Superior Court, pp. 455-459 (Applications, v. 2);

4. MacKinnon, Rape: On Coercion and Consent, pp. 471-483 (Applications, v.2);

5. Pineau, Date Rape, pp. 484-494 (Applications, v. 2);

6. Wriggens, Rape, Racism and Law, pp. 495-510 (Applications, v. 2)
 

 

 

 
© 2002, Professor Name, University of California - Hastings College of the Law 200 McAllister Street, San Francisco CA 94102
Redistribution or commercial use is prohibited without express written permission. Contact: (415) 565-4600 Email contact