a.
Retribution
i.
Moral equality of humans/unique appropriateness of jus
talionis
ii.
If we feel retributive urges, should we want the state to
act on them?
iii.
"The state should never sanction (revenge)
killing"
b.
Deterrence
i.
Common sense
ii.
Social science
iii.
Is there a "brutalizing effect"?
iv.
Who should get the benefit of the doubt?
c.
Incapacitation
i.
The trouble with predicting who will kill again
ii.
Life without possibility of parole as the proper point of
comparison
d.
The danger of mistake
i.
Who should get the benefit of the doubt?
ii.
Are abolitionists taking a long-term risk by emphasizing
the possibility of mistake?